Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...

"denis bider \(Bitvise\)" <ietf-ssh2@denisbider.com> Sat, 09 April 2011 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE01C3A694D for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6hmIje6qLQf for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.NetBSD.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:7:216:3eff:fe67:11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486523A68CB for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id 3FF2B19D164; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1785F19D163 for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at NetBSD.org
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.NetBSD.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id oDkeoaJWk511 for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from skroderider.denisbider.com (skroderider.denisbider.com [66.197.186.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A47B19D162 for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by skroderider.denisbider.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:36:39 -0400
Message-ID: <C24781132F6044E4904BE0BD0D88718E@element>
From: "denis bider (Bitvise)" <ietf-ssh2@denisbider.com>
To: Simon Tatham <anakin@pobox.com>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, galb-list@vandyke.com, jhutz@cmu.edu, mdb@juniper.net
Cc: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
References: <E1Q8URV-0001Py-OU@atreus.tartarus.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1Q8URV-0001Py-OU@atreus.tartarus.org>
Subject: Re: SHA-2 based HMAC algorithm...
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:36:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list

> Another minor nit: you're referencing HMAC,
> so you should add a reference to RFC 2104
> in which the HMAC construction is defined.

No problem.

I submitted a new version of the draft with references to RFC 2104 and 
RFC 4231:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dbider-sha2-mac-for-ssh-02.txt

denis