Re: [Curdle] DH Group Exchange in SSH (RFC 4419) - Avoiding Backsdoors

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Fri, 30 September 2016 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238B412B063 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oniph2rSEKoC for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.netbsd.org [199.233.217.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FB5212B046 for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id 0BD9F85F13; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:52:43 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1347) id AB3D585F0E; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:52:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A98585F0E for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org
Authentication-Results: mail.netbsd.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id joAMU1r1ZYl0 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:39:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8E985E7C for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:39:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1475217563; x=1506753563; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=R+CDpngbNpQPs7Dqap9Gg1D5r+tAnsB8SgyG3VGf7qA=; b=TJi4AoOzCTz1oxfFf/XH9sEmH1r6VpDiWoFZ2Nfv8c+kbhBLuqISa2yz azFFlDE2QvDG7H1yjI31HdCJchxD/bQXfgpK4nEI1u86rGtfGqkMralj3 HjZJgRxdJHufXWbPmdWCgMhLXbppx0UVMLi470xC1n5hx1vueBc+I2+7I gYK901JjlldoHX0naj7bsExvwQyelLs8Nv89qQ2OCbq707s0dpzOo/cIn szyW+2/5s7rpbQdSV77FOY6yu2U/Qi99S5Ze+xOr75gVe7cBfhe96Bop1 fGcEkhbX6cAc34mmh5cU5SjMfgNzfugX0TWPn0yewyJXJum9h4m75XqkH g==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,271,1473076800"; d="scan'208";a="108104725"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 10.6.2.5 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from exchangemx.uoa.auckland.ac.nz (HELO uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz) ([10.6.2.5]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 30 Sep 2016 19:39:00 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-tdc-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.3.5) by uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:39:00 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-tdc-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([fe80::8081:99e3:dee2:203]) by uxcn13-tdc-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([fe80::8081:99e3:dee2:203%14]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:39:00 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>, "ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org" <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>, "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
CC: "frg@irtf.org" <frg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] DH Group Exchange in SSH (RFC 4419) - Avoiding Backsdoors
Thread-Topic: [Curdle] DH Group Exchange in SSH (RFC 4419) - Avoiding Backsdoors
Thread-Index: AQHSGmBugXe6KnFfLEybUJVk/zgfHaCRlcvK
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:38:59 +0000
Message-ID: <1475217532173.25661@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <35937.1475160447@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <35937.1475160447@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list

Mark D. Baushke <mdb@juniper.net> writes:

>Should RFC 4419 - "Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange for the Secure Shell (SSH)
>Transport Layer Protocol" be deprecated?

No.

If you're worried about a malicious server then you'd really have to deprecate
RFCs 4251 to 4253, since only that will protect you from one.

Peter.