Re: SSH v3?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 06 December 2015 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41F51ACCF8 for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 07:32:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQerbf48wo9I for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 07:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.NetBSD.org [199.233.217.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F501ACCF3 for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 07:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id 8688785E6F; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:32:32 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05AF85E6B for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org
Authentication-Results: mail.netbsd.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id IXynQF2w_-qZ for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4FC85E47 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B9DBE49; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:14:54 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAMUPmLYXz4q; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:14:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.91] (unknown [86.46.30.27]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 195D2BE38; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:14:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1449411293; bh=ghLeX/GO7X/68qkgFoPUlG7grjbP08SMcQQXQAO6GnU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=18vC+AYXgXN5L4ybhuUaI/B/CTcK1Q9rllZltYpcjB3/AAIpSc4XKrpCDNHsmrXZn HIGlDBcEqgkDz1gKZrL+zBdTI8rFwNWJIABUYIPPRnD+bfiVoDArJNVNW9YXmTvDuE qy0kfyqeH9Gmp54yJaM6Vv7ue69tzA85oyQPUSr0=
Subject: Re: SSH v3?
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "ietf-ssh@netbsd.org" <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>
References: <1493720992-1452@skroderider.denisbider.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B9B35B@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <56643DCF.9090705@cs.tcd.ie> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BA08A6@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <566442DC.5000702@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:14:52 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BA08A6@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list


On 06/12/15 14:07, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:
> 
>> my belief is that you and maybe one or two others share that opinion about
>> TLS1.3
> 
> Oh, it's quite a lot more than "one or two others".  Most of them have given
> up contributing to the TLS discussion though, so it's not very visible outside
> of private email.

Could be, but we'll not know for some time as I said. (It's also
interesting that about every new or major change in the IETF seems
to see that same point made, but such is life.)

S.

> 
> Peter.
>