Re: [Sedate] Preliminary agenda for IETF 115
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 10 October 2022 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: sedate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sedate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAADCC14CE2B for <sedate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a59HETdjGrpr for <sedate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF5CC14CF0B for <sedate@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MmNKB25BNzDCdR; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:35:26 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJMFcSdR29W2jyeBFa0GHPLOfqNBvAGvmaH1-zYqaMCgcti5aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:35:25 +0200
Cc: sedate@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 687108925.6874141-adeffff590414e678d34a23f0e9856cf
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <677F99DE-FDE9-4ACF-9E3D-D84C6C806018@tzi.org>
References: <CAJMFcSdR29W2jyeBFa0GHPLOfqNBvAGvmaH1-zYqaMCgcti5aA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark McFadden <mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sedate/SVi3Xfn9vrZi7s7RviFrKsNcrLU>
Subject: Re: [Sedate] Preliminary agenda for IETF 115
X-BeenThere: sedate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Serialising Extended Data About Times and Events <sedate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sedate>, <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sedate/>
List-Post: <mailto:sedate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sedate>, <mailto:sedate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:35:31 -0000
> It does conflict with IABOPEN and EMAILCORE among other Wgs. EMAILCORE is interesting: the one feature that doesn’t work from RFC 3339 and that we want to update is inspired by Email timestamps — I would expect the people who might be defending that to go to EMAILCORE instead. Grüße, Carsten
- [Sedate] Preliminary agenda for IETF 115 Mark McFadden
- Re: [Sedate] Preliminary agenda for IETF 115 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Sedate] Preliminary agenda for IETF 115 John C Klensin