[sfc] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-farrel-sfc-convent-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-farrel-sfc-convent-05: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-sfc-convent/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This spec enables an SC node to create new packets and therefore must provide
congestion control consideration to avoid network overload from these packets,
e.g. in the simplest case requiring a maximal sending rate/minimal time
interval between to packets.

I also requested an additional TSV-ART review for further feedback and
recommendations for a potential solution.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this document should update RFC8300 as it does not only register an new
protocol but also changes some of the process for this specific case.