[sfc] Benjamin Kaduk's Abstain on draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-10: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 22 June 2018 18:23 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical@ietf.org, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, sarikaya@ieee.org, sfc@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152969181163.3611.2830752447026021853.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 11:23:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/7PW8c-nTrqBhxdtDLuRVioOvBrU>
Subject: [sfc] Benjamin Kaduk's Abstain on draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-10: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-10: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the quick updates to the document.

As previously indicated, I am Abstaining, since this document includes a proposal for adding
a new category of NSH metadata contents, and as discussed during RFC 8300's evaluation there
is not a mandatory integrity protection option for such metadata.

[sfc] Benjamin Kaduk's Abstain on draft-ietf-sfc-… Benjamin Kaduk