Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 16 March 2015 02:37 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19CD1A1DBD; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qgSG9hYyJUy; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE651A1C00; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BTR21203; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:37:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:37:04 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.244]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:36:57 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Hao Wang <wangh13@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>, sfc <sfc@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQXY5qmW+qqfnN4E6JrNshfZYx8p0eY0yQ
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:36:56 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846F54E4@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <5502E0A7.5050906@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <5502E0A7.5050906@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.180]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA846F54E4nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/AOTMfLLN7PLkSEKsujcO4B8HlEQ>
Subject: Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:37:10 -0000
Hi, Hao: Thanks for your interests and valuable cmments. See my reply inline below. -Qin 发件人: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Hao Wang 发送时间: 2015年3月13日 21:06 收件人: sfc 主题: Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt Hi: I have read this draft and think it's useful for this PCEP extensions, which can allow stateful PCE to compute and instantiate SFP. Several commets below: 1. How about multi-SFP instantiate maintainance, can this stateful PCE be handled？ [Qin]: Good question, the simply solution is to carry multiple SFP Identifier TLVs to indicate multi-SFP instantiate from stateful PCE server. If we look for more generic way for multi-SFP handling, we may reference draft-dhody-pce-association-attr-01 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dhody-pce-association-attr-01.txt and define generic group id to do this. 2. As figure 1 show, what's the relationship between SFC control plane and stateful PCE Policy？ [Qin]: SFC control plane is more about policy driven, In each interaction between SFC control plane and SFC data plane, Policy will be installed or populated at data plane node. For example, each interaction between PCE server and SFC Classifier Will lead to classification rules being installed which enable SFP selection for the traffic, each interaction between SFC controller and SFC data plane node(e.g., SFF) will lead to forwarding policy being populated at the corresponding nodes. 3. Is there any way to manage or configue the process of instantiation of SFP? [Qin]: This is what we try to solve in this draft and proposes a way to manage or configure of SFP instantiation process. The basic idea is to use PCE initiated mechanism proposed in draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-02 and combine with SFP Identifier TLV proposed in this draft to provide SFP instantiation management. Best Regards, Hao 2015-03-13 ________________________________ Hao