Re: [sfc] [IANA #1272596] expert review for draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam (nsh)

[Carlos Pignataro <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the request!

In general these look good to me. I only have some questions for consideration:

Some of the (sub-)registries created could potentially benefit with Experimental allocations. For example, SFC Active OAM Message Type, SFC Echo Return Codes (maybe), SF Identifier Types
An editorial question — Sections 10.2.2. and 10.3.1. respectively number bits as "7-0” and “15-0”. Since the description says 0 is the MSB, should that be 0-7 and 0-15 to be more clear?

Thanks!

Carlos Pignataro (He/Him)

> On May 16, 2023, at 2:18 PM, David Dong via RT <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Carlos Pignataro, Joel Halpern, and Jim Guichard (cc: sfc WG),
> 
> As the designated experts for the NSH Next Protocol registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam for us? Please see:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
> 
> The due date is May 30th, 2023.
> 
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/nsh/
> 
> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act on the first response we receive.
> 
> With thanks,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Specialist