IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] IPR check for draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 26 January 2014 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461C81A0144 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:58:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QJePm5EiS_iv for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:58:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6671A0141 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:58:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4029; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390748302; x=1391957902; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=O91G980y8rtFELWsKlrKn7GlKhyosQfeu0OvNwVsdkc=; b=RJuu9m992aQKB7CnxolOfNwih/xRSLb68evTTXaCOaAn1e4pcZVK3Gje uDiJEtcNTWatDYbM/hqXc+/LWO64q8CEs4lBjD0h4xRSaQKPQtwdrxTnN ItYuqVJXNlkgC4M+AM3dXcZF7FnZ4mMseu+csQoQWJ3Lr8aA4RbKKJyt9 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4HAFch5VKtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagkhEOEoMtAWIU4EDFnSCJQEBAQMBbgsFCwIBCARCMiUCBA4FDodvCA3HYheOKxEBUAeDJIEUBJA9gTKGOIEykGyDLYFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,724,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217"; a="15620589"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2014 14:58:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0QEwLvn004894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:58:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.76]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:58:21 -0600
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR check for draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPFtu2NSEh36Zfh0G0Wjova3ew6JqXhP6A
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:58:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D3EB407D-24D6-44AA-BA18-55CEA9A2656C@cisco.com>
References: <CF042F13.145ED%jguichar@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF042F13.145ED%jguichar@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.229.159]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_021D233B-3616-4100-974F-DB682AD6FF5F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] IPR check for draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:58:26 -0000

Chairs,

I am not aware of relevant IPR applicable to draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement-02.txt.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com> wrote:

> This email serves as a poll for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft [1], to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). 
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and major contributor. 
> 
> If you are on the SFC WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Jim & Thomas
> SFC chairs
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement-02.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email