IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Adopting draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 28 May 2019 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE625120203 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qGTwr4OuQc4H for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B99B120073 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id r76so7212474lja.12 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hE6fsGd3Rx4ri40KNdumSWOlCoslNRS8bwhE1mfpbEY=; b=qEsC+7+Faw/Uxpsr7Xhug6hyTlkSpMy3cc8pXYnLCNq9It3KG9Nc6zMcYIczRxEsr/ BBRuLva9mlP8rH8QOas9sIELLQ43lojEEFlo03/27D7OH7XocLjXZJmkc7SBiBC6VWej MVKM7Ay8QeDMxXFHofIxIRM/ktxw8v0DmWMDm6KsH1lFvQ/tU53GptlC7yR5lT9OuCuY PgSeS5feFdpG01rVIOk0ld8gKGBAG1F2pUOhUpnuy/NbhB2TDUiCI03+LtjykUrguT13 Pyn0JPLLFTKvEzbADTUU/dhljxxbM7vDdFznPH17wjKaQCSSyQZq07Z3Euw6hAQ+fZwK mA8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hE6fsGd3Rx4ri40KNdumSWOlCoslNRS8bwhE1mfpbEY=; b=YsYHT9ablvoFgBGTuBhw0oVhNg+qo+cFCXBpqTKmxf4FbQtf1WvBFkpLpnv7HSyxo1 lpHCchPySpyOYgyQPT8LL95LCLCW9aTRT0bjanyeX9OkinaoYYyrCOI+NoCstFMwt2hh HsdC4Ps7epGByiFloCnbgoFL7LceENBRRstdTTsH5nKcUg+QpnVKPxj6Ru4gXZa/Dz31 nUczRfGhrahH9wJU5DDgsZFsNsSR5Vv4wGHzDit6TgTRh5JpqePdPshBSj6ulRg6tWrw Y4HGQ9xERUfCCrDRb97fLqFAGtLaSYvd0kiEulrKYBEJCk+oIUT6u2B4oFiz3e4CICwj ngSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsD7qW4+Fh0lRSHmIQC6t4tHB2PTdboYcl/xsYLav4rXXHQ4vW MH/sCJrCVUbep3ptGYVgVvFuwOHiT6hTIAtW4ub3L4cn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJLQv+C77+a7auEe9gJUIDrokB9s9XrE2x0fGl9E0pzv7ZRSqUTSLlQpmB295m9S233vHgbh6zWg0RFe8491s=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9193:: with SMTP id f19mr23811367ljg.111.1559055156665; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmXFfeoPd5jTqfvG7RAxgDxQePmuV4j4VuvVC1-H=p5OZA@mail.gmail.com> <b2c4ca07-e012-72b7-476c-2ca17c3f9748@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <b2c4ca07-e012-72b7-476c-2ca17c3f9748@joelhalpern.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:52:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUzVhQO=YcHSpaLUNZoTBt12nZ5TPFYbA6LyXQhSZ93GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cc629b0589f3d04b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/MBtbLS-zaVfGFfjOI7qk81B4jCI>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Adopting draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 14:52:41 -0000

Hi Joel, Jim, et al.,
I support the adoption of the draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm as one of its
co-authors. The document proposes the allocation of a new field in NSH in
support of the Alternate Marking method [RFC8321]. Using the new field the
AltMarking in SFC NSH allows efficient calculation of performance metrics
including packet loss, latency, jitter and residence time for SFF and SF.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:17 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
wrote:

> This email starts the adoption call for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/).
>
> Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document as a
> working group document.  Please provide reasons for that view.
> Silence will not be considered consent.
>
> The adoption call will end CoB 10 June 2019.
>
> Yours,
> Joel (and Jim
>
> On 5/20/19 1:58 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> > Dear Joel and Jim,
> > authors ofdraft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm believe that the draft, that defines
> > how the Alternate Marking (RFC 8321) technique can be used in SFC NSH,
> > is stable, and ready for the working group adoption. Much appreciate
> > your consideration to start the WG AP.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Greg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email