IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11.txt

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2915D3A03C9; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esxFC8o2T6wD; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308883A02BB; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id b26so40134156lff.9; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CrbsgAoq/sOhb0Mc8iz6Oy0gIFOYqj4AtZSct7KxBHM=; b=K0Ai55vsUSznFsZmNzYu/IUz5EICIle+RmOTJUVCJ6COLYmrHumdr7jwbQv/cmLpKE pBmyeQ3caw5eMkozZsJjkbvK+ArEBsy4zJBWVjCLY6lj9L6H/0bZb+S9n2xTZPAZffqp pJXY3x10RjjRJnbujZgHXHiT/mz85TohJAcTmLoisNXiXZKGHGAARBLQO9BcqZPprp7q DGDPPF0liR8PmlON7KWOQYDhCWOsjYc3CrTOTXNqEaYAPjWEcQ4XbyGHsV0DYqdP+sPo uprZLQ2SxvVguKEqF15Uqxgn0TVOO1eGAUrvEfveu7xZrMyVKHQI/Sj2cNK5V9zkQhpX 0tyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CrbsgAoq/sOhb0Mc8iz6Oy0gIFOYqj4AtZSct7KxBHM=; b=T7ijvfVIbaHG2chcSLFO6cAazecUoV5d/nBjydVOYMK5SB0h/ek7TGqMTXrmK77xUh kcYiFsZCh+mCG7eiprucpO6JCSJ5s/fPxXJvdZ9M5RrR9Wdp5GYNDqVGPDtzkkehIWZC wB//jbNu02Xe1r6/x92BPD9pODzfIa9pxuBqa8Xo7FLGY7xRFSlMnhl9rlqpDZPdK8HY +ZT1zIoLS4J4ai2+roZXRW5wpVojafzQ1Je37h3/ABhr1BaGxrSC12zupfsk4y+rLGy6 H5ZYrGb0b1lnBIQdX+rai9/xhmfvA1FU+eQ4rnemxvv47Jy1KdVDV/PP7K6vh5ahJUQP T2IA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rCh1x/clGCfTEODdHQtPGVaK0ica8jclDPOI/SaAEeHiDDJKQ oNZvCrpMwqZD5kNiUmnT1oKHnyxvmz18J2dNeIxpv/h5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6QfaUxhsyeveaGL8eU4DvTtXjugqyCzirqJNjymQhb+P0ZWOR5JwIboHjUidP99FWsCUJKHDfRPnZaA+xJqQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a494:: with SMTP id h20mr27810324lji.145.1609360543169; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160935991448.10084.1656363121271306061@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160935991448.10084.1656363121271306061@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:35:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVSQ54fRgLKZPVUgaWHQ6Ev_6V5OJ_LPYBe4sib3kVqLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, sfc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007dbfa005b7b4734c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/QwYFluzsFKArm8-7ro_gkZepT-0>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:35:47 -0000

Dear All,
happy and healthy New Year to you all!

In this update, we've cleared a bunch of editorial nits. The document is
technically stable and the authors greatly appreciate the WG consideration
of adopting this work.

Regards,
Greg (on behalf of the authors)

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM
Subject: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <sfc@ietf.org>



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate
Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain
        Authors         : Greg Mirsky
                          Giuseppe Fioccola
                          Tal Mizrahi
        Filename        : draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11.txt
        Pages           : 8
        Date            : 2020-12-30

Abstract:
   This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used
   as the efficient performance measurement method taking advantage of
   the actual data flows in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-11


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email