Re: [sfc] SFC Honolulu meeting agenda

Hello Jim & Thomas, 

We would like to request four 5-min slots for presenting the following 4 
drafts:

1. draft-khasnabish-sfc-dsi-apps-00 (5 mins)
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-khasnabish-sfc-dsi-apps/
This document has useful contents about DSI that can be utilized
for service chaining in multi-tenant (Data centers) environment,
automated load balancing (ALB), and automated disaster recovery (ADR).

2. draft-meng-sfc-broadband-usecases (5 mins)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meng-sfc-broadband-usecases/?include_text=1
This document has useful contents for SFC in broadband use cases within 
the scope of 
charter. Provide use cases under several scenarios , Internet Access from 
Homes/Internet 
Access from Enterprises/Added-value Service Access(DAA/IPTV/voip)...

3. draft-meng-sfc-chain-redundancy (5 mins)
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-meng-sfc-chain-redundancy/
This document has useful contents about SFC redundancy on service 
node/path/instance.
Maybe it could be merged with architechture or oam draft in the future.

4. draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam (5 mins)
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam/
This document is a complementary of SFC OAM, which could be merged into 
SFC OAM architecture.

Thanks very much!

BRs,
Linda Wang&Wei Meng

"sfc" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> 写于 2014-10-06 21:26:40:

> "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com> 
> 发件人:  "sfc" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org>
> 
> 2014-10-06 21:26
> 
> 收件人
> 
> "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, 
> 
> 抄送
> 
> 主题
> 
> [sfc] SFC Honolulu meeting agenda
> 
> Greetings WG:
> 
> Our meeting at the upcoming Honolulu venue is fast approaching.  As 
> always, the goal of the meeting will be to make the best use of 
> limited face-to-face time.
> 
> As we build the meeting agenda we welcome requests for agenda time. 
> As always, the goal of a meeting slot is to best further the work of
> the WG, and that generally means focussing on key charter 
> deliverables and topics with important open issues to resolve. In 
> the case of individual IDs, the goal isn’t necessarily to present 
> what is in the draft but rather to help the WG decide what to do 
> with the ID. With that in mind, when making an agenda request please
> consider what you think the WG should do with its content. For example:
> Does the document have useful content that should be moved into 
> another WG document or progress on it’s own merit
> Does the content have a good basis for one of the WG documents per 
> the charter (in order for that to happen the document needs to be 
> the most appropriate out of the collection of related documents)
> Should the document content be merged with one or more other 
> documents, so that a combined document could become a WG document
> Jim & Thomas_______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc