Re: [sfc] is current SFC architecture supporting different types of SFC header formats?

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for your answer!

Does this mean that the SFC architecture is allowing the use of different Service Function Chaining Header (SFC encapsulation) formats?

I am referring to the different SFC encapsulation formats that are discussed in section 5 of the following ID:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boucadair-sfc-design-analysis-03.txt

Best regards,
Georgios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:46 PM
> To: Georgios Karagiannis
> Cc: sfc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sfc] is current SFC architecture supporting different types of
> SFC header formats?
> 
> Hi, Georgios,
> 
> The SFC architecture document concerns itself with the functions and not the
> format.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos.
> 
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 5:17 AM, Georgios Karagiannis
> <georgios.karagiannis@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please note that I was reviewing the SFC architecture draft, see below, and
> I have a question:
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sfc-architecture-02.txt
> >
> >
> > Can you please let me know if the current version of the SFC
> > architecture allows the use of different Service Function Chaining Header
> formats?
> >
> > These formats and their analysis can be found in Section 5 of the following
> draft:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-boucadair-sfc-design-analysis-03.txt
> >
> >
> > If that is not the case, please elaborate why.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Georgios
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc mailing list
> > sfc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc