[sfc] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-11: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 04 May 2023 06:09 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org, gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <168318056396.27468.15301171969657655862@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 23:09:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/gBiB0XGSLCWYJbWid96tax1RpDw>
Subject: [sfc] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-11: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Jim's and Roman's DISCUSS positions.

Thanks for a well done shepherd writeup.  I note that the writeup advises
notifying IPPM of this work.  Was that done?

Section 2 defines "SFC", but the document doesn't actually use that term
anywhere.

[sfc] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ie… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker