[sfc] 答复: PCEP Extensions for Service Function Chaining (SFC)

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ABD1295CE for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luPpyntSf_Fq for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DF41294C7 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CVI85975; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:43:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:42:40 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:42:33 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: PCEP Extensions for Service Function Chaining (SFC)
Thread-Index: AdJAgO1RsNEN2eVCSXOP4RRw2KyxmwAJEQTr
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:42:32 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE2BB37653@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8548B777@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8548B777@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.116.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE2BB37653NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.582D5F97.0028, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 813528e65c4bf5cdf88a37088dfb3aac
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/gV-gGNQQ6C8hPjj5NSZBaSabOk4>
Subject: [sfc] 答复: PCEP Extensions for Service Function Chaining (SFC)
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:43:24 -0000

Hi,



It's great to know that the PCE WG is now working on PCE Extensions for Service Function Chaining.



The following is a draft about PCEP extensions for the MPLS source routing based SFC (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining-00):



https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-pce-sr-sfc-03



Any suggestions and comments are welcome as well.



Best regards,

Xiaohu



________________________________
发件人: sfc [sfc-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Qin Wu [bill.wu@huawei.com]
发送时间: 2016年11月17日 15:01
收件人: sfc@ietf.org
主题: [sfc] PCEP Extensions for Service Function Chaining (SFC)

Hi, folks:
Chair remind us recently to announce to this list that PCE WG is working on PCE Extension for Service Function Chaining. Here is the relevant draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-09
Please take a look at it and your comments and suggestions are welcome.

-Qin