Re: [sfc] IETF90 Toronto SFC Agenda

[Eric Gray <[e-mail]>]

Linda,

                Jim clearly explained the criteria used.

--
Eric

From: sfc [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:56 PM
To: Jim Guichard (jguichar); [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [sfc] IETF90 Toronto SFC Agenda

Jim and Thomas,

With so many drafts to SFC, why not asking for two or three meeting slots?

It is not fair to " turn down 7 requests". What are the criteria of choosing which drafts to be discussed in the f2f meeting time?

Linda

From: sfc [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jim Guichard (jguichar)
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:22 AM
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [sfc] IETF90 Toronto SFC Agenda
Importance: High


Dear WG:



Below is the draft agenda for SFC. Please note that we received more requests for presentation slots than could reasonably be accommodated (we had to turn down 7 requests). We based our selection on overall relevance and importance to the SFC charter and the immediate deliverables (at this point, architecture, requirements, OAM, encapsulation).

A copy of the agenda is posted here -> https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/proceedings/90/sfc/. Please can presented forward copies of their presentations to Thomas and I so that we can upload them to the proceedings page prior to the meeting.

0.00 Introduction (WG-chairs) - [10 minutes]

- Update on PS progression (WG-chairs) - [5 minutes]

- Agenda bashing, note-well, (WG-chairs) - [5 minutes]



00:10 SFC requirements discussion (presenters + open-mic) - [20 minutes]

Purpose: Discuss how to progress requirements within the WG. Which documents should requirements be included in? How do requirements drive our charter? How should requirements be structured and documented?

- SFC requirements discussion (Ron Parker) - [10 minutes]

   * http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-sfc-requirements/

- SFC requirements Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]

00:30 SFC architecture discussion (presenters + open-mic) - [20 minutes]

Purpose: Identify current status of architecture work. How do we get to a single WG document? What gaps need filling from other existing documents? What other documents fall under the umbrella of architecture?



- SFC architecture merge (Carlos Pignataro) - [10 minutes]

   * http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/



- SFC architecture Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]



00:50 SFC encapsulation - [30 minutes]

Purpose: Discuss WG progression of SFC encapsulation.

- Network Service Headers (NSH) (Paul Quinn) - [10 minutes]

   * http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quinn-sfc-nsh/

- Service Chain Header (SCH) (Ron Parker) - [10 minutes]

   * http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-sfc-sch/

- SFC encapsulation Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]



01:20 Service Function Chaining Operations, Administration and Maintenance Framework - [30 minutes]

Purpose: Present SFC OAM framework, which is an essential piece of the SFC charter and work areas.



- SFC OAM Framework (Sam Aldrin) - [10 minutes]

   * http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aldrin-sfc-oam-framework-00.txt



- SFC OAM Requirements / Framework (Ramki Krishnan) - [10 minutes]

   * https://ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-sfc-oam-req-framework/



- SFC OAM Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]



01:50 Open Source SFC - [15 minutes]

Purpose: Present a working SFC implementation as a start to investigation into the control / management plane requirements that need to be addressed as part of the SFC charter and reported back to OPS.



- Open Source SFC implementation (Reinaldo Penno) - [15 minutes]



02:05 SFC use cases - [20 minutes]

Purpose: Review use case progression. Are further documents needed? What is missing from existing WG documents?



- SFC Generic Use Cases (Hongyu Li) - [10 minutes]

   * http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases/

- SFC use case Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]



02:25 Closing (WG chairs) - [5 minutes]

Thank You

Jim & Thomas