[Sframe] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sframe-enc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Linda Dunbar for the GENART review.  I reviewed this document for
GEN area issues.

** Section 8.1.  Per the SFrame Cipher Suites registry, did the working group
consider adding another column to the registry to capture the whether the IETF
recommends the use of a given ciphersuite?  Consider the definition of a
“Recommended” column in the TLS Ciphersuites and COSE Algorithms registries:

--
https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-parameters-4
-- https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/cose.xhtml#algorithms

Could such a Recommendation column be added here?  It helps readers of the
registry quickly understand which registrations have an IETF endorsement, while
still making it easy to add code points.