[Sframe] Issue grooming
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 03 February 2023 12:56 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46360C1575C6 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:56:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmoSw4X8uY1e for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B800DC1575B2 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id h16so4545350wrz.12 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 04:56:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PiHcfMUNaqcTO89uwhDdZuAaimOsQmvS+7deQBa9y0s=; b=U15xnZt6qMqwTNFan2MNVz5Jkn4i90Z8xHToY2ZesRu0BGUsrAd74EuP9ikJ3GcY6H E/iT/dELYoEPa3YDEtMG6f84KHFtwSZVHY2HsHQJYGxWTh542/rP9rkW7f3LY/p0Umkg PdvjE73Ob+1JbnrCEfWQlJVtxeIJS0uzv3553r2+nMZEawiPqIhWaFdyWQpHWwIxZAoD h3HdRn27tbSaxmgZkU0dklB43diMHd1SzBQFwNxjjVoTDnCTIO6kMwc4BqLzBi/YMv7+ w+tu9geMAWybKEgu9NwpHVgP0H9d1xGNjXGT8tyxEu1QVJdbMgQchJ1BDPrYoq5ixMcM IvsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PiHcfMUNaqcTO89uwhDdZuAaimOsQmvS+7deQBa9y0s=; b=n1gnOkD1UI9NbsRMxgAqXvTsZntStE33b6WGyd+2jzmjkb8FVVZt1QEc9bFsb+ELza Ldl5uhaNVLyFroqg2vujXBYBs3Gizfhjys7HJmobhAyaMbVEKfM4GPyx+7oATFXeuGVM 8WsHGsRUOB+lv+dIZ6mau3Fv5jaoLvocA/vr9EjI7KwLhbFx03SIJLjPDs6f+PD2aBf/ EyhTmAWxceLfNbAaNKOu99/kM+HxGPT0Kn8UZURw4e5ekWGvfkht7GefvSO+EVNdCYaA Et9dr8OBTYsVG6ruJgKIefkDcrr3HmvMbSL7re02RakHQ6wjKnd5OtwwwwjkPstVlkeq L3Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXnWKB1SUndvZY0YVx/AqRTOV9i8f++jxYU8ZNFecsSbNvd0rNZ jeGdHoqob5Z7AcVZPnyciPQFJIDT4iJSFSq97tDenHw0EEw51wIc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8htIzhsWo6+vW9VFcr0KwH8cRIBtpDO7cVCGrJQEq5rlmHGYwkIVzOJ1HUHupf3Sxl/nLXM7mq4qt7uhxmDVM=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ebc7:0:b0:2c3:d6a4:5fcb with SMTP id v7-20020adfebc7000000b002c3d6a45fcbmr80024wrn.464.1675428989542; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 04:56:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:56:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRgNFK-Xfg0S6KAyZYN_Kzh5BM4dMkBpEVxbOQJRMq=5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4b54c05f3cb3580"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/Wy-V5knp9G9HrXDoMnfmiEpXJrA>
Subject: [Sframe] Issue grooming
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 12:56:36 -0000
Hi all, In an effort to get the repo in better shape, I did a grooming pass on the issues and marked several as obsolete, in the sense that the problems they raise are no longer an issue in the current spec: https://github.com/sframe-wg/sframe/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aobsolete Please take a look, and comment on the issues if you think these issues are *not* obsolete. Otherwise, I will make a pass mid/late next week and close the obsolete issues. Thanks, --Richard
- [Sframe] Issue grooming Richard Barnes