[Sframe] Issues need WG feedback
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 03 August 2023 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C80C151072 for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20221208.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGcVOwK785fG for <sframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 08:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com (mail-ed1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::541]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5E5C14F75F for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 08:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51a52a7d859so4816427a12.0 for <sframe@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 08:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691077079; x=1691681879; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=w+3NbR/6htRDh5uOXRNyGWRRc3XZ2bCbI48Se9eLvVI=; b=a4WIEVNX9JckqWi+Le6K5Ta99yZy1blFDJBXSRkUvpqeCqz47Q/IrYal1y38vykF6t XsbUtHIJE6uPPwSg9wMheeVadrJCRS15WkBOzcyCHmK+X4whj1+i5KimUho7tIXD16YF K3BLJo79jd6LOifsmidW912iJ/5ojKgSHRhG+lz9m0elreMTf5cd9AEDBnqV/9+XkMv4 p6JnYmNd21h0GKFTn97oASbuLGpRCtUF68c3y3/ZZzbP5D+oT9MJoXFfHHvQsToSrs9R ++I5kKCfzLFrfBeTmUSJd4CUvT4dOV+LogJqTyTnURiMMp3WP5mvDjd/0OKx3ADfyzb/ VM2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691077079; x=1691681879; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=w+3NbR/6htRDh5uOXRNyGWRRc3XZ2bCbI48Se9eLvVI=; b=WJt6qrXSeVLVHoiYxrjwtp1u3b4E5s2LtkKjso0EQMVW4PriS9xvWK/Zlodj1Mj1Pr hp0lGsDeFPabBgWgmk7SoG0zMNFTGWJ6/CJOoKiKagZ86eNInOcQJXaZtF/qT00ljVib A5aIOEYp6iVD1AlAy6BdcVuhIUjVbEYvBFj+87CbzDVloI5PQUs9yrN7W6vY1w3WlkfV Ib4WziKaHC5fsspCTJ4CPkj/rRNMcESp1+lOVH1OzZGJWpbEkacBTdPV9opMUdk/+kU8 F54LtPmp/wpSeNfabX47Dt/UcIr4J9f83tcD+QpZg7gmHnMfBVjXZAfAE9YtXz9VagFd WdWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYdUM4MSVqwgPaxfKNSpdKgBou7P8gk3nzjBWuivhlk/F8J99O2 XnQMRWDP9QlkArwjjj3p3voXhlxY7PIsD0ALJxKYA2QqxeYHea/fpRIoSvEeha4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEdNeOAuXFYdsJm7tSasFa3D2bEeCWN8UzZoMBEcfHIphEoOL0aG50ySU0fDS4aCg7hmDj4BC4Y/x88MQ4ECTk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d15:b0:99b:cadd:c2ee with SMTP id sa21-20020a1709076d1500b0099bcaddc2eemr11007120ejc.29.1691077078725; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 08:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:37:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSLX_xe6Q4vM=bSD4RKzmPUvfU3JqOphA84LmcWCQgb8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: sframe@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000090cf6006020690d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/bJz5arV9CharL_uRl-K1C9yyfgk>
Subject: [Sframe] Issues need WG feedback
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Media Frames <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:38:05 -0000
Hi all, There are a few open issues in the WG repo that could use review / feedback. Your review and input would be helpful in getting the SFrame specification done. #132 - Explain CTR IV formation better https://github.com/sframe-wg/sframe/issues/132 #129 - Make KID and CTR symmetric and parallel https://github.com/sframe-wg/sframe/issues/129 #128 - Incorporate cipher suite in key generation https://github.com/sframe-wg/sframe/issues/128 If we can get these issues closed (the remainder are largely just about updating test vectors), then I think the spec will be basically ready for WG last call. Thanks, --Richard
- [Sframe] Issues need WG feedback Richard Barnes