draft-bagnulo-pshim6-01.txt

Deguang Le <le@cs.uni-goettingen.de> Sun, 13 May 2007 15:37 UTC

Envelope-to: shim6-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:40:23 +0000
Message-ID: <464730D0.7020802@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:37:52 +0200
From: Deguang Le <le@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
CC: shim6-wg <shim6@psg.com>
Subject: draft-bagnulo-pshim6-01.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear Prof. Marcelo,
page5:
  When H1 sends the first packet addressed to the CMULA of H2, the
    packet is intercepted and processed by the P- Shim6 box of the
    multihomed site.

As above description, H1 sends the first packet, which uses the CMULA of 
H2 as the destination address. The CMULA is site-local adddress.

Since the destination addresss of the first packet is the CMULA of H2 
that belongs to H2's site, I wonder if this packet can be routed in H1's 
site.

The reasions are ss follows:
According to rfc2373, routers must not forward any packets with 
site-local source or destination addresses outside of the site.

Reference [12] has the following description:
Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses are intended for local 
communications, usually inside of a site.

RFC4193 provides operational guidelines that forbid default routing of 
local addresses between sites in section 4.1.

By the way, the reference [12] seems have been updated by RFC 4193.
    [12]  Hinden, R. and B. Haberman, "Centrally Assigned Unique Local
          IPv6 Unicast Addresses", draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01 (work
          in progress), February 2005.

Cheers,
Deguang