IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com> Mon, 17 April 2006 23:06 UTC

Envelope-to: shim6-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:06:42 +0000
Message-ID: <44441F70.6020000@sun.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:06:24 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Igor Gashinsky <igor@gashinsky.net>
CC: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>, shim6-wg <shim6@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Igor Gashinsky wrote:

> [1] Those requirements, which shim6 currently fails to meet, again, are:
> 1) equal or better TE capabilities to PI multihoming in IPv4
> 	a) those capabilities controled site wide, not host-wide
> 	b) those capabilities covering all deployment scenarious that IPv4 
> 	   currently covers and people use heavily (ie inbound/outbound 
>     	   TE, transit TE, partial routes TE, peering TE, etc)
> 2) equal or better convergence around failures as IPv4 ie (1st packet 
> 	shim)
> 3) do all that without an undue burden on the server/SLB/proxy device

Igor,

have you looked at the ideas in draft-nordmark-shim6-esd-00.txt to see 
if there is something in there that would be helpful with respect to #1 
and #2 above?

   Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email