Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se> Tue, 18 January 2005 09:52 UTC
Envelope-to: shim6-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:51:22 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <AC7708DF-6936-11D9-A357-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="fixed"
To: shim6@psg.com
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:52:32 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I managed to screw up the To address on this mail... Begin forwarded message: > From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se> > Date: den 18 januari 2005 09.58.52 MET > To: <shim6@psg.com> <shim6@psg.com> <shim6@psg.com> > Subject: Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 2005-01-17, at 13.52, <john.loughney@nokia.com> wrote: >> Could I suggest a change to the current charter: >> >> From: >> >> MAY 05 First draft of architectural and protocol document >> MAY 05 First draft on cryptographic locators, if required >> MAY 05 First draft on state managment >> >> To: >> >> MAY 05 First draft of architectural and protocol document >> MAY 05 First draft on cryptographic locators, if required >> MAY 05 First draft on failure & rehoming event description >> >> This is, of course, not considering the discussion we have had about >> the >> potential need for a seperate architecture draft. >> >> Anyhow, State management to me, means the internal protocol state, and >> message processing rules, etc. For example, I think >> draft-arkko-multi6dt-failure-detection-00.txt might cover some of what >> I'm thinking about. I also wonder if any of the work in DNA could >> also be referenced here. I'm definately interested in contributing >> on this topic. > > so having thought a bit on this, and started working on an updated > version of the charter. I originally put in the state machine document > to have the entire document set somewhat more "modular", but also > because I thought that making an conscious effort to try and develop > the statemachine. After reading the mails here, Johns mail on the > "interaction" with transport made me think that having these as to > separate documents probably is a good idea - as we might want to change > state interaction with transport without changing protocol elements. > > As for the proposal above to change the name, isn't failure and > rehoming also somewhat misleading as sate is also establishment and > disconnect (I guess also somewhat along what Marcelo pointed to)? > > I am for keeping this as a separate document, but I am open for > suggestions on names. I will try and write some more text explaining > the context/content of the document.... > > - - kurtis - > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 8.1 > > iQA/AwUBQezP06arNKXTPFCVEQKxugCggpVDuhlCkIi5Ab2gaQDBm10FGdEAn0/S > SlN5Z65lV7Vo/eK2+J2+lz/Q > =R2HV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQezcZqarNKXTPFCVEQJRKwCg6B1J5ky/bwsq83HHSnSTha/p9LUAoMGw HtF6bs1kpYcg1VFXeo29G2fe =sRlp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing John Loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Thierry Ernst
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Christian Huitema
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Erik Nordmark
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Jari Arkko
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Jari Arkko
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Jari Arkko
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Jari Arkko
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Jari Arkko
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing marcelo bagnulo braun
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney
- Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing john.loughney