IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [shim6] Meeting at IETF79

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 11 September 2010 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: shim6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385CF3A6893 for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUObrpj4zoWB for <shim6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F1C3A66B4 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so1962007pvg.31 for <shim6@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dpRrA5vh2zmLZGWaqzZlZz5EB+0cTuNnOe0qvCxSimU=; b=fzd2A/D0VuwcjwBq/G+ZNDY+jsd8d3YHHTBfwNLiSZNy6soVZIfZVCRxprNDk3zMuD KhH6Us13OH5yLTGUDibc6T08HA5xYYhXRIUppK0EbRMDMQbyz4IOihFqsw6K9xCaZBRl dGNdpplRp3pIh+x+akVPFBpfXe9i0m2cQ0rMQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZyI3ApXbh6X+7pg/ez2TfGVht1rmYEniKSebcfsIDuqboG1Ybj873RrH1gqgH7X9fa fVQyZDth1lZlsTNlFD/j8qML73IozGFkUH7cpvDlwV0pisWw6wSTKLHpxsB7AUDSifO2 c39FWIJ/JIoDxoPB8GT4t9FMmadh1zibUs9wo=
Received: by 10.142.209.4 with SMTP id h4mr648724wfg.272.1284238048046; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.142.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n34sm5504319wfa.2.2010.09.11.13.47.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C8BEAD6.40807@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:47:18 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
References: <1284037107.13379.128.camel@bit> <4C891297.3000005@gmail.com> <4C8950F1.2060008@gmail.com> <1207F1AD-9E97-41D2-BA07-0BD5CA11A5FF@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <1207F1AD-9E97-41D2-BA07-0BD5CA11A5FF@apnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mingwei Xu <xumwcs@gmail.com>, shim6 <shim6@ietf.org>, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>, Zhongxing Ming <mingzx@126.com>
Subject: Re: [shim6] Meeting at IETF79
X-BeenThere: shim6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SHIM6 Working Group Mailing List <shim6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/shim6>
List-Post: <mailto:shim6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shim6>, <mailto:shim6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:47:02 -0000

On 2010-09-11 14:20, Geoff Huston wrote:
> 
> On 10/09/2010, at 7:26 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> On 2010-09-10 05:00, Scott Brim wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2010 14:58 GMT+02:00, Javier Ubillos wrote:
>>>> Is any one interested in having a shim6 meeting in Beijing?
>>>>
>>>> Given the chance, we would like the opportunity to demo a variant of
>>>> shim6 using names (FQDNs) rather than a pseudo addresses.
>>> Sounds like RRG material, now that their agenda is open.
>> I agree. But do we need a meeting as a target for finishing off
>> the open drafts?
>>
> 
> 
> There is one open draft (applicability) and one that I need to do a proto write up of (api)

How close are we to WGLC for draft-ietf-shim6-applicability-06?

IMHO, it needs a quick tidy-up but then it's done. If we could drop
some of the I-D references for dead drafts, that would be good.

> 
> I am perfectly happy to schedule a wg session if there is interest.

I'd say: only if we have significant issues in -applicability.
Otherwise, declare victory.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email