IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6485 (4340)

Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rhansen@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABEB1B31C0 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xY7IO4qY6diB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F0E1B3206 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from socket.bbn.com ([192.1.120.102]:56064) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rhansen@bbn.com>) id 1YlN9B-0008as-EZ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:50:53 -0400
X-Submitted: to socket.bbn.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30B123FE6C
Message-ID: <55394D15.4040104@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:50:45 -0400
From: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <20150420173628.D2FEA180092@rfc-editor.org> <AB5B55EA-7C4B-469B-BE12-5CE1741AEFC9@apnic.net> <553687A5.50503@bbn.com> <8F0E0F5C-5A48-4A43-83F0-5DCB63AF3BAD@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F0E0F5C-5A48-4A43-83F0-5DCB63AF3BAD@ieca.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dG4SO5ebJn0uvfhk3vPIWNoQ941CDjfq7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/2ZOxfSlGIeHPy7EQSi2xL_pa0DE>
Cc: db3546@att.com, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6485 (4340)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:51:17 -0000

On 2015-04-21 18:49, Sean Turner wrote:
> so I'd probably just leave it.

Are you saying that the errata process is too heavyweight for a minor
editorial typo like this?  If so, is there a more appropriate way to
report an editorial typo so that it will be fixed in a bis if/when one
is ever produced?

Thanks,
Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email