IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Wed, 23 March 2016 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B272112DCFE for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1Cj_cEZM9fT for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mahimahi.ripe.net (mahimahi.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1372]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82C0312DC6C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 05:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by mahimahi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1aigPC-0006nn-Ax; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:52:51 +0100
Received: from sslvpn.ripe.net ([193.0.20.230] helo=vpn-204.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1aigPC-0004SB-3G; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:52:50 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <FA611ED7-8457-460F-ACBF-4F41E6BD10AB@tislabs.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:52:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CF0F5E54-74FF-4658-8B02-F7BCFE4308C5@ripe.net>
References: <769D58E2-90FF-4F93-ACDB-3D1F8C0B2294@tislabs.com> <FA611ED7-8457-460F-ACBF-4F41E6BD10AB@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: /
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -0.2 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a071932949feb4fb268addd74c7a135f92309
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/3phJZu1-mDsmEHr79iSJHpFBh_Q>
Cc: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:04:13 -0000

Dear working group,

Please progress. Thank you authors!

Tim

> On 21 Mar 2016, at 22:20, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> A nagging reminder.  There has been no comment, pro or con.
> 
> It’s a short draft.  Please do review and say whether you want the draft to progress or not.
> 
> If you want to see the differences in this latest version, one way is to look at the tools page for the draft:
> 
> draft page: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
> side-by-side diff:  https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05.txt
> 
> —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chair
> 
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
>> As discussed in December, a new version for draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis was required to deal with an IESG comment on the Security Considerations section.
>> 
>> The authors have submitted a new version and ask for a working group last call.
>> 
>> This starts the wglc which will end on 23 Mar 2016.  Please review the draft for its readiness for publication and provide comments to the list.
>> 
>> Positive support is needed in order to judge consensus for publication, so please do comment on the list.
>> 
>> The draft is available at:  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05.
>> 
>> —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email