Re: [sidr] about grandparenting

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Tue, 14 August 2012 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E3721F8673 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8+jUbUOyUfp for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCFC21F866D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 2F356213635; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (chaxch06.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.95]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC312135F0; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:07:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.17) by CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:07:36 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net ([169.254.1.124]) by CHAXCH03.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.17]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:07:45 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] about grandparenting
Thread-Index: AQHNdzkcHOX63dulWkagCqlNnf/eOZdZoPcA
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:07:44 +0000
Message-ID: <B6BBB3C7-2271-4CA3-9143-DC1719B924BC@arin.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F5556C@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F5556C@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9278D56DBA75F94EBA91603924126495@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] about grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:07:48 -0000

On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> For example.  One action already mentioned would be issuing ROAs for the grandchild, by the grandparent.  That doesn't disturb the consistency with the allocation system.

I'm not speaking for anybody but me here, but I would think that the notion of RIRs issuing "operational" ROAs would be a BIG layer 9 issue.

-andy