Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra
<Sandra.Murphy@parsons.com> wrote:
> There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive.  But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
>
> Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption?

I responded back on 11/27 supporting adoption. Wanted to make sure
that my vote still counts...

W

>
> Recall: silence does not indicate interest.
>
> We give this another two weeks (for people who are taking a Christmas present holiday in some warm climate).
>
> Repond by 24 Jan 2014.  Please.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> ________________________________________
> From: Chris Morrow [morrowc@ops-netman.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:39 PM
> To: sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org; sidr wg list
> Subject: WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases
>
> Howdy gentle WG folks,
> The authors of:
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00>
>
> are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed
> text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption.
>
> The abstract says:
>   "There are a number of critical circumstances where a localized
>    routing domain needs to augment or modify the Global RPKI.  This
>    document attempts to outline a few of them."
>
> Please consider this a 'WG Adoption' call, and let's attempt to close
> this out by:
>   12/9/2013 or 9/12/2013 or Ninth December Twenty-Thirteen or ... you
> get the point, see you in 2 weeks with (hopefully) clear direction from
> the folks behind the emailz.
>
> -chris
> co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr