IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt

Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBD01A92B4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFah5CcglAsf for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A471A92B5 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so20026257wij.0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=SY30p8z2aOVeIwMwz4Uc7qI2kAb7nK2r8mNIZrtWKA4=; b=gMHxpKkLZlUdyqqZ+7JWgjc9hFPbKK3IyFOHYC9KlPTPIUNaQwsdiC/hWMso5P9RWq F9smScVsHxc9XvkFMkhqCmmM46w6V+mXCQceS5lgGFCi1fM2lqrkoEXIsrCUYAcpe2MI tBUldh1aBBJzh/zY3KYqUzKtFyQbSAEYFXNsgcvFecr7YCI0XDgdiFa6hDEiiSyNMv8b fzX2TqKjwyF3Y5ZbV296NS2RV0heg9pmiBwAbVh6nc3B+q1pJBp4bd0jXBRXmHTJAA68 YLU1PueL+op5nwoH0pYEBie3+zMI1rFqOkjfBHVplQV0FNoJoRpr+l3LLuZEQhYXkZEQ n6dQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.205.229 with SMTP id lj5mr9321761wjc.57.1444901407160; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1510131517100.32318@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1510131517100.32318@tislabs.com>
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:29:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CALo9H1Z2BLWHaie-L8Hn_BJTX8SwtJLUfB_NPiy=6bkYja5g7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>, sidr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7ba984b81bff1c0522215303"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/BTEr3OUxK_UZAkFEUnJa_w0t6A8>
Subject: Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:30:10 -0000

As I mentioned, I do not have a strong position but I think that is
important to have the record of why we are changing this.

It could be something very simply in the intro of the current document, an
appendix or it could be a separate one.

-as

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 at 16:02 Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> wrote:

> > We were about to ask the WG chairs for a WG Last Call on this document,
> > but then noticed that this is an informational document and its
> > attempting to update a standards track RFC
>
> Changing the "intended status" of a doc seems easier than spinning a new
> one.  In any case, I would prefer to see the change and the context for it
> kept together.
>
> Also, both/either document would benefit from a more meaningful abstract
> and intro.  At the very least, briefly explain _what_ is being changed.
> (The abstract and intro of the current WG doc hint at "why", but still
> don't say "what".  The new doc does neither.)
>
> -- Sam
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email