[sidr] acceptance of drafts as working group items

Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com> Fri, 08 August 2008 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sidr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sidr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sidr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2DE28C137; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5560C3A6D59 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.744, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVMGzE9t+u4p for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACAB3A67B7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([157.185.61.2]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:35:07 PDT
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m78EZ4Q8014447 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:35:07 -0500
Received: from nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com (nemo.columbia.sparta.com [157.185.80.75]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.12.11/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m78EZ5Qe004785 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:35:05 -0500
Received: from localhost ([157.185.81.155]) by nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:35:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:35:03 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0808081023560.4352@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-X-Sender: sandy@nemo.columbia.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2008 14:35:04.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[F29775B0:01C8F963]
Subject: [sidr] acceptance of drafts as working group items
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: sidr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org

Before the Dublin meeting, I requested working group input on adoption of 
three different drafts as work items.


draft-huston-sidr-bogons


draft-huston-sidr-repos-struct


draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation

While there has not been a huge outpouring of opinions on the question, 
all the responses received have been in favor of adoption of the drafts as 
work items.

I declare that there is consensus to adopt these drafts as work items.

Most of the comments were directed to the roa-validation draft, and I 
encourage the working group to continue the energy in working on that 
topic.

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr