Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5187)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 28 November 2017 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314D0127078 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:17:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WWuAr8MLoFqt for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D89126B71 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1eJepV-0004Si-7I; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:17:37 +0000
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:17:34 +0900
Message-ID: <m2374yvbq9.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com>
Cc: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>, db3546@att.com, sidr@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, robertl@apnic.net, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAEGXcODB3WtLNk3tQ52yUNDn2jVzxJYtQaCGhS_+tFmKEWHnZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20171128090411.26C0DB80C87@rfc-editor.org> <2D0550E2-5A6A-4C10-8B4A-74A1E88E1EC1@apnic.net> <CAEGXcODB3WtLNk3tQ52yUNDn2jVzxJYtQaCGhS_+tFmKEWHnZQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/FdL7pwMfNZyau8LsKDzBA2Wewjo>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6487 (5187)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:17:44 -0000

> What about certificate that contain IP address set only OR AS number set
> only (not both)?

s/and/or/ seems formally correct, albeit a bit nitty

>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>>      encompass
>>>         Given two IP address and AS number sets, X and Y, X
>>>         "encompasses" Y if, for every contiguous range of IP addresses
>>>         or AS numbers elements in set Y, the range element is either
>>>         "more specific" than or "equal" to a contiguous range element
>>>         within the set X.
>>>
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>>      encompass
>>>         Given two IP address or two AS number sets, X and Y, X
>>>         "encompasses" Y if, for every contiguous range of IP addresses
>>>         or AS numbers elements in set Y, the range element is either
>>>         "more specific" than or "equal" to a contiguous range element
>>>         within the set X.