IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Reviews of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt needed

"Sonalker, Anuja" <SONALKERA@battelle.org> Fri, 09 November 2012 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <SONALKERA@battelle.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0499921F85EE for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:10:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1mw8KWwyGHd for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from egw3.battelle.org (egw3.battelle.org [131.167.253.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7164F21F8521 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (lp-prfpnta3 [127.0.0.1]) by lp-prfpnta3.battelle.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qA9KAf27028291; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:41 -0500
Received: from lp-prfpnta5.milky-way.battelle.org ([10.50.10.72]) by lp-prfpnta3.battelle.org with ESMTP id 18c3y925m6-1; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:10:41 -0500
Received: from pps.filterd (lp-prfpnta5 [127.0.0.1]) by lp-prfpnta5.milky-way.battelle.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qA9K8Cle026499; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:41 -0500
Received: from ws-bco-cas2.milky-way.battelle.org (ws-bco-cas2.milky-way.battelle.org [131.167.8.115]) by lp-prfpnta5.milky-way.battelle.org with ESMTP id 18c3xvsqye-1; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:10:41 -0500
Received: from WS-BEST-MBX1.milky-way.battelle.org (131.167.188.7) by ws-bco-cas2.milky-way.battelle.org (131.167.8.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:41 -0500
Received: from WS-BEST-MBX1.milky-way.battelle.org ([131.167.188.7]) by WS-BEST-MBX1.milky-way.battelle.org ([131.167.188.7]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:10:39 -0500
From: "Sonalker, Anuja" <SONALKERA@battelle.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:10:36 -0500
Thread-Topic: [sidr] Reviews of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt needed
Thread-Index: Ac2+mWTUl1lq9ifhQiShwcOrwhxTNwAHGheA
Message-ID: <AEDBD9C3109C3649BF68A077B7A592FD058B9BA1EE@WS-BEST-MBX1.milky-way.battelle.org>
References: <509D32CA.3080107@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <509D32CA.3080107@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-09_03:2012-11-09, 2012-11-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1207200000 definitions=main-1211090193
Subject: Re: [sidr] Reviews of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt needed
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:10:44 -0000

Hi Alexey,

I looked at this document and have no objections with it.

Anuja


-----Original Message-----
From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:44 AM
To: sidr wg
Subject: [sidr] Reviews of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-02.txt needed

Hi WG,
Can I please get at least 3 people (other than editors or WG chairs) that can reply that they looked at the document and it looks Ok? Saying that there are some issues with the document is also fine. I can't really send it to our responsible AD without any reviews.

Thanks,
Alexey

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email