Re: [sidr] RPKI <-> allocation consistency

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Sat, 01 September 2012 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE4F21F8440 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MagWZmCA9WXt for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7BB21F843C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so4508776vcb.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pzPy3aRL+XEe0ivITwZ7cuH2fAFJd6Rfi6nQkqyPHBQ=; b=MEndJBkGfNfQzYZXkuL1zN8kCzXmWDeNuHC2wTH+e1MmOSSNG/GK15qF/Dtn0B5Go9 pQSaivz8dXGekBilpveOkKmjQD40LArwGWrKuJtpWCiATezR5n+E19d0EVwNFJgpEUnX 3f4Rc+vWfOlN/Lz4Xs27CQV9CxCD4SUYo8TkqoQXO1GbYBFfWy8rCxDGS5WAS2TpBq2y KUK9J1WByUo4VjBv0CeSoSlUmmJYgdNvvzymvOLAXlN6PMdr/xhMTBL2lfswfjPd5R/K CmbfQjL2QcAuum/ckH84WhkwhRIVwvlle2MfnEvLpjbKg05ndPQdRSZL7PB3qVzeAZXU sBoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.88.18 with SMTP id bc18mr5645469vdb.99.1346470985615; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.216.42 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqScOwzcAWEuFfHKH4kP6gj45fKqs6rdPq97PsYO+uEMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F555CB@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <D857A4BB-E484-45A4-A09F-FB8FAF2215AC@tcb.net> <C5B88834-3A10-41F7-A4F3-2B7C9B540197@verisign.com> <50389897.3040503@bbn.com> <97856400-9F70-4AEC-AF91-A0673A6D716D@verisign.com> <503C47A8.7030700@bbn.com> <303C576D-D1F8-4F62-8E0E-0D74A28B2771@verisign.com> <503D141F.1060404@bbn.com> <3A791D9E-4F16-4481-94AE-BD38A5389593@verisign.com> <CAL9jLaaew6HLdHK4=UrsUF2JKsRRV=sbXzCOFiDnLRKtVSK1tw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirWo+JYOpFjVhtxXYKGB86nLhcogC20bEy0-Ldkp7Oc8A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaY3JLBf7H5H2zWvxv2T=9ZsSQbOAxM+mTixefZkF8oVFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiqScOwzcAWEuFfHKH4kP6gj45fKqs6rdPq97PsYO+uEMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:43:05 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: T6Ln0Ye0TE2719TFlV7qwPjb5Bk
Message-ID: <CAL9jLabBmuqOUu4Y_2Lu+HVhWDc9_dneYQVfxqvc1C7ZF+44+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI <-> allocation consistency
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:43:08 -0000

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Brian Dickson
<brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, does it not make sense that the RPKI, meaning its design, architecture,
> procedures, etc., should actually enforce exclulsivity?

see tim's note.