Re: [sidr] Protocol Action: 'BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-11.txt)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 03 March 2017 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484B4129667; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:33:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W2kUoKTiDx09; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E34129607; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cjb9S-0001ca-13; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:32:54 +0000
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 09:32:51 +0900
Message-ID: <m2k287xkr0.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <904eb4e5f3b54f8fb5eeddba482566c6@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <148414831932.11019.14685466226406323027.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <904eb4e5f3b54f8fb5eeddba482566c6@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/LFHqUnikW68g9pWsheF31fU4Alk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling@ietf.org>, "sandy@tislabs.com" <sandy@tislabs.com>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Protocol Action: 'BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-11.txt)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:33:00 -0000

> What happens if a BGP speaker validates a route in its own RPKI
> database and finds it to be either Valid or Invalid (not NotFound) and
> also receives the extended community that specifies a different
> validation state?
> 
> I don't see that condition covered in the draft.
> I would say to ignore the extended community.

agree