IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-11 (ENDS 30-Oct-2015)

Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9697D1B33AD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KttTMCfCMDLB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0F91B33AE for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E86E28B003D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:57:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (nova.tislabs.com [10.66.1.77]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AAB1F8035 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:57:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:57:56 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1510261740320.25993@tislabs.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/M8dgbPafs6mXNgs789hOG-9dT7s>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-11 (ENDS 30-Oct-2015)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:57:59 -0000

I have read the draft and have no objections to it going forward.

Suggestions:

Section 5 talks about some of the requirements for (future) algorithm and 
key size agility, but says "The recommended procedures to implement such a 
transition of key sizes and algorithms is not specified in this document." 
(sic)  I think it would be good to cite some discussion of that, e.g. 
section 6 of -protocol.  (I'm not saying that section 6 of -protocol is 
complete or great, but it may be the best set of words we have right now.)

Nail down the initial codepoint in the IANA registry (this doc is 
creating the registry, so we can be specific).  I suggest "1".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email