IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Mon, 05 May 2014 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DF31A0478 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 11:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDJxZqkRe2_x for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 11:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F099E1A045B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id AF6C35934; Mon, 5 May 2014 18:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 18:57:50 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20140505185750.GA43515@shrubbery.net>
References: <CB23313F-4612-4B4C-B29C-A446ED5B4356@tislabs.com> <m2tx9g4nb6.wl%randy@psg.com> <C0CB1396-F7A8-4D8A-B260-B32DB2B01C0B@tislabs.com> <m2ha5dz55b.wl%randy@psg.com> <E233B3DD-0DDC-4AFF-BC4B-AE669BF811BF@cisco.com> <m2a9awgnt9.wl%randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2a9awgnt9.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Puw4gWemh8yQ4OH8NgDV4rGwf_Q
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 18:58:00 -0000

Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Randy Bush:
> > And lets not forget: Running Code: Last but not least???the draft has
> > been delayed more than what it should and several implementations
> > (including two from Cisco) has running code + documentation +
> > training. As we are pushing to improve adoption of RPKI, I rather
> > spend time adding the missing pieces that removing what is not
> > broken???although the need may not be obvious for everyone.
> 
> actually, code removal is not an evil, quite the opposite.

esp. when 1 company has 2 (two, zwei, dos!) implementations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email