[sidr] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-14: (with COMMENT)

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again, thanks for a very readable document.

I did have one question - I saw that you're chatting about the same
paragraph with Alissa, but I'm wondering if "the transitive closure of a
client's customers" has a precise meaning. I know what a customer is, at
the hand-waving level, but I'm not sure how I would know whether any
particular case fit that description, at the corner-case level. Is
"customer" being used a shorthand for another term that isn't depending
on an economic transaction?

(If this was "the transitive closure of a client's clients", for
instance, I would know what that meant - and I'm not at all suggesting
that's correct, only offering it as an example of the kind of thing I'm
asking about)