IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-dseomn-sidr-slurm

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Mon, 14 September 2015 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA561B35B6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 03:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRVgnMYZWDAr for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 03:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from molamola.ripe.net (molamola.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1371]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9AB91A90AC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 03:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from titi.ripe.net ([193.0.23.11]) by molamola.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1ZbQc9-0005pt-5H; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:03:59 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ripe.net ([193.0.20.230] helo=vpn-27.ripe.net) by titi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1ZbQc8-0004FO-Vh; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:03:57 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <9FCE9E00-B8BE-48CA-8B75-B2D31957BCA1@tislabs.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:03:56 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D972F9E-453A-4178-8EE3-5BF212965CEA@ripe.net>
References: <51693906dadd4c8eb52dfea1c7e16feb@mail.mandelberg.org> <9FCE9E00-B8BE-48CA-8B75-B2D31957BCA1@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a07191ed6b2587c339f675cf4d0895763158d
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/ShQ_sjHyXm2SK9T1YFYEex-Ozt8>
Cc: sidr@ietf.org, David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-dseomn-sidr-slurm
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:04:05 -0000

Hi,

I understand it's past the end of call date, but I was fortunate enough to have a three week holiday that unfortunately covered these two weeks.

In any case I too support adoption. As I said at the mic in Prague, we are already doing some of this in the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator and having a standard for this would be useful.

Tim

> On 28 Aug 2015, at 01:33, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> The authors of draft-dseomn-sidr-slurm adoption have requested working group adoption.
> 
> A working group adoption call starts now and will end 14 days from now on 10 September.
> 
> Please respond on the list to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item AND whether you will participate in the discussion.
> 
> Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, not just absence of objection, so speak up.
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email