Re: [sidr] Agenda discussion topics

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

Chris,

> 1) Validation Algorithm Document/process - We've talked about this
> on-list a bit, and in at least 3 face-to-face meetings, the document was:
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01>
>
> and recently became this:
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered>
>
> Reading this and talking about it at the meeting seems in order, to me
> at least.
>
I quickly glanced at the new version of this doc. It seems to be a 
reasonable
starting point for WG discussion, since it tries to focus on the problem
and not mandate a solution. Since the author list now has a representative
from every RIR, I'd like to see a discussion of what procedures the RIRs 
envision
to help minimize the likelihood of the problem arising (I offered some 
examples a
while ago), so that we understand the likelihood of this problem arising 
(at the RIR
tier) after such procedures are employed.

> 2) SLURM/Suspenders/LTA - What should happen to LTA things with
> referenced documents being at least:
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dseomn-sidr-slurm-00.txt>
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-ltamgmt>
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kent-sidr-suspenders-01>
David and I just updated the 1st and 3rd docs above, referencing Randy's
uses cases I-D. As we noted earlier, we would like to kill the 2nd doc 
above,
and replace it with the other two. Either David or I will plan to speak
briefly on this topic in Toronto.


Steve