Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 02 August 2011 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82521F8661 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bl8CHaAvlMH4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC36D21F8640 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p72IGiGw021975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:16:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA5DB039.5C296%dougm@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:17:03 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E45FD30-EB93-4AF5-A8FC-5D5122E82923@vpnc.org>
References: <CA5DB039.5C296%dougm@nist.gov>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Subject: Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:17:02 -0000
On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Montgomery, Douglas wrote: > As a practical matter, what do you think the effect of the "MUST" in the > last sentence will be? That vendors cannot provide bare TCP as a transport in a system that contains no other security mechanisms. On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > IMO, this last line should read: > > other forms of trusted security at or below TCP That seems like a good addition. --Paul Hoffman
- [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Joe Touch
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Montgomery, Douglas
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Paul Hoffman
- Re: [sidr] Expected protocols in rpki-rtr Randy Bush