Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickson-sidr-route-leak-def-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Sun, 11 March 2012 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3552721F8754 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clfuZqgAmTG0 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516A221F874C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1CE201703E1; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:36:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:36:44 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120311213644.GA21499@slice>
References: <20120305180943.16641.16867.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAH1iCiqvN2FhOhLGuZ44rm9BeUSM0UD9_qupt8eSD-nkX39cpg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqvN2FhOhLGuZ44rm9BeUSM0UD9_qupt8eSD-nkX39cpg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dickson-sidr-route-leak-def-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:36:45 -0000

Brian,

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:31:23PM -0500, Brian Dickson wrote:
> Here is the first of three IDs, concerning the definitions of "route leak".


: 1.1. Rationale
: 
: 
:    A route-leak occurs when a prefix is originated by one party,
:    propagated by other parties, and received by the observer, where the
:    path used was not intentional end-to-end.  It is a leak if the
:    receiver did not want the route, from a generic policy perspective.

If the receiver didn't want the route?  While that's perhaps true in many
cases, the impacted party is usually someone whose route was distributed
outside the scope where they intended it to be distributed.

-- Jeff