Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases-00.txt

David,
	Ever since LTAM was designed, I have been intrigued by one of its motivation that a nation can protect nets within its administrative jurisdiction by directing internal nets to rely on a national authority for RPKI data for these critical infrastructure resources. I think it’s a significant concern in deploying RPKI worldwide.  As you know, I was trying to figure out how to utilize LTAM or Suspenders especially where NIRs exist.  I am therefore looking forward to seeing your new draft called SLURM that is going to bring some new ideas.


Di Ma
Internet Domain Name System Beijing Engineering Research Centre (ZDNS)


在 2014年2月7日，上午2:53，David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org> 写道：

> On 2014-02-05 21:12, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> The lta-use-cases draft was motivated as a way to start/guide
>>> discussion of the Local Trust Anchor Management draft and the
>>> Suspenders draft.
>>> 
>>> The question is whether we need both efforts, or only one, and if so,
>>> which one.
>> 
>> if you accept the three cases of the use cases draft, you may be left
>> thinking that neither ltam nor suspenders meets the needs.  it's all
>> about roas, certs are incidental.
> 
> I think Suspenders meets Carol's use case. Carol could publish a LOCK and INRD as a precautionary measure. Then when the Dutch court attacks, relying parties that use Suspenders would detect the attack and could continue to route to Carol.
> 
> I'm working on a new draft called SLURM (Simplified Local internet nUmber Resource Management) that I hope to have out before the cutoff next week. I'm pretty sure it handles Bob's use case, and I think it could also handle Alice's use case if I understand that case correctly.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn
> http://david.mandelberg.org/
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr