Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR

George Michaelson <ggm+ietf@apnic.net> Wed, 11 November 2009 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm+ietf@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15A13A67EB for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yerK9FOXri4e for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B23A67AF for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host-24-67.meeting.ietf.org (host-24-67.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.24.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44D7D58C1; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:02 +1000 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: George Michaelson <ggm+ietf@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <0C96AB4C-3FC6-41AB-A942-6A10025DB4DA@apnic.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:35:30 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F07CD823-C8AA-41F8-8502-C7327A5ADEE8@apnic.net>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0911101150590.10528@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <FECB6B2B-835D-41FC-A197-90F2E9525FDE@apnic.net> <m2ocn9x03a.wl%randy@psg.com> <2E82F928-2F4C-4C77-8772-A7A277463990@apnic.net> <Pine.WNT.4.64.0911102239530.10528@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <0C96AB4C-3FC6-41AB-A942-6A10025DB4DA@apnic.net>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] wg consideration of IPR
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:35:11 -0000

I must apologize to the WG for having made a mistake in my dates. I have post-dated the work Geoff and I submitted, which actually hit the IETF draft status in February 2008.

I wish to revise my statements.

1) Geoff and I co-authored an individual submission in February of 2008.

	draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-00

  this was subsequently adopted  August 7 2008

	draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-00

2) Pradosh Mohapatra and John Scudder edited a draft dated October 27, 2008

	draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-00

3) In November 2008, Cisco filed IPR in respect of this draft. This is what I can tell from looking in the IETF IPR disclosure system. I received no notification of this, relating to my work.

4) In October 2009, I became aware of a Cisco IPR claim in respect of

       draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-00

The IPR statement was lodged with the IETF dated November 18 2008.

5) In November 2009 I received direct notification from Cisco/IETF that the IPR claim was also applied to the draft I co-authored. 

This is an IPR statement dated November 2 2009

So, thats the time sequence as I see it, based on what I can recall from emails to sidr WG, personal mail, and the drafts found online.

-George

Again, this is my personal opinion. I speak for nobody else in this matter.