[sidr] SKI collisions conversation closure
Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768181A19FA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lc6xyrAPVYz9 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644111A21C2 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C67128B0043 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F51A1F8035; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_735FA91C-8712-4A7A-B8B9-E216C93F01E1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:00:10 -0400
Message-Id: <B013A8FB-6AD3-4F69-9CC8-8FBB166835C9@tislabs.com>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/hIp9SR64SjVbHd_Wrc52_ZZJPOM>
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: [sidr] SKI collisions conversation closure
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:01:28 -0000
It appears the working group consensus is that a note should be made in the security consideration section that hash collisions can occur and that a relying party should notify the operators if any such collisions are discovered. Could the authors please provide a new draft with such a security considerations section. The two drafts draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs and draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles have been around for a long while. The authors and chairs believe the drafts are ready for a working group last call, once a revised draft for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles has been submitted. So be aware and stay tuned. —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
- [sidr] SKI collisions conversation closure Sandra Murphy