Re: [sidr] grandparenting

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 18 June 2012 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69E421F8692 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.899, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7b-sqyuVDuoj for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEAE21F8627 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-227.bbn.com ([128.89.89.227]:49185) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1SgeaL-000Cgf-CK; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:13:49 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240803cc04f7a56986@[128.89.89.227]>
In-Reply-To: <m262attj04.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <p06240814cbfea9e229ad@[128.89.89.114]> <m262attj04.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:22:34 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] grandparenting
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:14:29 -0000

At 11:18 AM +0900 6/15/12, Randy Bush wrote:
>steve.  the EXAMPLE in the draft was one of a thousand.  perhaps we need
>only one example.  maybe two if the semantics are wildly different.
>
>randy

I'm all in favor of including examples. But, I dislike including
examples that may give readers the wrong impression. So, I suggest
including one or two examples that are less prone to misinterpretation.
Steve