Re: [sidr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7132 (4454)

[Chris Morrow <[e-mail]>]

This seems correct to me (the proposed change I mean)

At Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:45:52 -0700 (PDT),
RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7132,
> "Threat Model for BGP Path Security".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7132&eid=4454
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: David Mandelberg <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
>    significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
>    origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
>    [RFC6810].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    PATHSEC is intended to address the concerns cited above, to provide
>    significantly improved path security, which builds upon the route
>    origination validation capability offered by use of the RPKI
>    [RFC6811].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> I think this text should reference RFC6811 (origin validation), not RFC6810 (the rpki-rtr protocol).
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7132 (draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Threat Model for BGP Path Security
> Publication Date    : February 2014
> Author(s)           : S. Kent, A. Chi
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG