IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adtoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Wed, 17 July 2013 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722E321F9D87 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wB6d8jJqyCbp for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1342]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624AB21F9D30 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayeaye.ripe.net ([193.0.23.5]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1UzMYu-000281-9a; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:54:14 +0200
Received: from puppy.ripe.net ([193.0.1.230] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by ayeaye.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1UzMYu-00018M-7b; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:54:12 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6749764D5@CVA-MB002.centreville.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:54:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3B906D38-8112-4B3B-A626-B9BFB670885A@ripe.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6749764D5@CVA-MB002.centreville.ads.sparta.com>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.48/RELEASE, bases: 20120425 #7816575, check: 20130717 clean
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a071981583fbcdbc17dd7aae857a325d26e82
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adtoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:54:25 -0000

Have read and support adoption.

I agree with Randy's remark that 6810bis would be a better path, but that can be fixed later.


On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:36 PM, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> wrote:

> On behalf of the sidr co-chairs, this opens a two week wg adoption call for the draft draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt.  The wg adoption call will end 18 July 2013.
> 
> Please respond to the list as to whether you agree the wg should take this on as a wg work item.  (It is not necessary to comment on the draft content at this time.)
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Randy Bush [randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 8:57 PM
> To: sidr wg list
> Subject: [sidr] draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt
> 
> chairs,
> 
> could you please turn the crank to move this through wg adoption?
> thanks
> 
> fwiw, i doubt it will move through to wglc/rfc, but rather a 6810bis
> may be the better path.
> 
> randy
> 
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: randy@psg.com
> Cc: keyupate@cisco.com, turners@ieca.com
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt
> Message-ID: <20130409005340.26017.92925.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:53:40 -0700
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:        draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys
> Revision:        01
> Title:           Router Key PDU for RPKI-Router Protocol
> Creation date:   2013-04-09
> Group:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 5
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-ke=
> ys-01.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-keys-01
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-key=
> s-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   The RPKI/Router Protocol v0 is specified to carry the PDUs necessary
>   for RPKI-based Origin Validation.  For BGPsec Path Validation, the
>   routers also need data extracted from BGPsec Router Certificates.
>   This document adds a PDU to the RPKI/Router Protocol to carry those
>   data.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email