[sidr] neglected topics

"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Thu, 25 October 2012 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF6721F892D for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwLHNSFpgDM2 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB04221F88A9 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9PFP3MW020688 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:25:03 -0500
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9PFP2gS023824 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:25:02 -0500
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5%19]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:25:02 -0400
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: neglected topics
Thread-Index: Ac2u9W5JqshnzyuNSxecWu4uTmgeaQ==
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:25:01 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F634705E02@CMA-MB003.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sidr] neglected topics
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:25:07 -0000

There are a few topics that had an initial flurry of energetic discussion, were adopted by the working group, and then had little if any further discussion.  These could be a part of the agenda for the upcoming meeting, but prep for the discussion by at least looking at the drafts would be good.

One was the topic of local trust anchor management.  This was discussed as an individual draft and saw some strong exchanges.  It was refreshed at the last meeting, but there's been no subsequent discussion.  This is a feature that gets mentioned from time to time and seems important to deployment.  The presentations at meetings show that this is a complex feature, so it needs serious consideration.  The authors have requested a wglc, but the chairs are balking due to the lack of discussion and the complexity.

WG, please take a moment to review the draft.  Newest version is:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-ltamgmt-07

Topic 2:

Getting the appropriate key pair into a router.

This was a hot topic for a while, but has seen little actions since.  There is a draft, but again, not much discussion.

Newest verison is:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying

Others?

--Sandy, speaking as co-chair