[sidr] [Errata Rejected] RFC8206 (7183)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 27 October 2022 10:52 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A22EC1522D9; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rHcHXnFLYijJ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA62C14F749; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 23FF255D3E; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: iljitsch@muada.com, wesgeorge@puck.nether.net, sandy@tislabs.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221027105238.23FF255D3E@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 03:52:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/oz9wEcqvB8uZY9JEFrU94zpcNlw>
Subject: [sidr] [Errata Rejected] RFC8206 (7183)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:52:42 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8206, "BGPsec Considerations for Autonomous System (AS) Migration". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7183 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Date Reported: 2022-10-26 Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Since SPs are using migration methods that are transparent to customers and therefore do not require coordination with customers, they do not have as much control over the length of the transition period as they might with something completely under their administrative control Corrected Text -------------- Since SPs are using migration methods that are transparent to customers and therefore do not require coordination with customers, they can transition at any time without delay. Notes ----- I have no corrected text. If the migration methods are transparent, how is it possible that SPs "do not have as much control over the length of the transition period as they might with something completely under their administrative control"? As it's transparent they would in fact have complete administrative control. --VERIFIER NOTES-- === This report is rejected because the current statement is correct in the context in which it is written. In short, SPs and customers both need to transition their configurations to the new ASN. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/6OYVQlXdJcllkB-motxDi7uuqhg/ -------------------------------------- RFC8206 (draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06) -------------------------------------- Title : BGPsec Considerations for Autonomous System (AS) Migration Publication Date : September 2017 Author(s) : W. George, S. Murphy Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [sidr] [Errata Rejected] RFC8206 (7183) RFC Errata System