Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised I-D Needed "

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Thu, 08 October 2015 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A901B2D43 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fc7W_76sWyZy for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ia-mailgw.apnic.net (ia-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:a:851::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A861B2D41 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:return-path; bh=6yjRnI8tH+4C5cpNw7S5MC+6o5V+psl/PdtYESK5wOY=; b=mVVs7JQKEdst3Jtyiz5YjfToF5BrXWMLkXK0KBWh3VGiThDMzsjcBoXvm5shIqykp0AljJ2uKAAWJ EK8egxiOVCiDWL2G50KHULpo5zWr5YdbRHfml2MVBiL4x79zs5abSASe1AADvrpD2fzXy1FAC85nOO Om9ovDeHdgTGQ/3Y=
Received: from iamda3.org.apnic.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:2::101:249]) by ia-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:56:37 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from [172.16.137.34] (203.119.101.249) by iamda3.org.apnic.net (203.119.111.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:56:22 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <E91F4D62-1FB4-4AFE-B07D-34019EAB031F@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:56:13 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <7A8285B5-6C9E-4E8D-8486-CA719414AA68@apnic.net>
References: <E91F4D62-1FB4-4AFE-B07D-34019EAB031F@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/q3Zm6DLgQCfPnRzQ_7L8jyaKTG8>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised I-D Needed "
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 21:56:29 -0000

> On 5 Oct 2015, at 2:03 PM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> The draft draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 was approved by the IESG, provided the comments received during IETF Last Call were addressed.
> 
> The IETF Last Call comments were noted to the sidr list in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07208.html.
> 
> As wg co-chair, I am satisfied that wg has consensus is to adopt “Option #2” [ (allow but do not mandate line breaks)] as mentioned in the message that brought up the problem [http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07164.html].
> 
> The draft authors are requested to submit a revised version of the draft including this response.   That would get the draft to publication.
> 
> In the initial message, the following text was suggested.  The draft authors may use this as they wish.
> 
> 2. Permit but don't require newlines.  For example, change Section 2.1
>  item #3 from:
> 
>    3)  a subjectPublicKeyInfo [RFC5280] in DER format [X.509],
>        encoded in Base64 (see Section 4 of [RFC4648].
> 
>  to:
> 
>    3)  a subjectPublicKeyInfo [RFC5280] in DER format [X.509],
>        encoded in Base64 (see Section 4 of [RFC4648]).  To avoid
>        long lines, <CRLF> or <LF> line breaks MAY be inserted into
>        the Base64 encoded string.
> 
> —Sandy, speaking as co-chair


Sorry for the delay - it slipped off the desk and the dog ate it.

Here’s the revised id with that vitally critical sentence added.


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05.txt
has been successfully submitted by Geoff Huston and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis
Revision:	05
Title:		Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator
Document date:	2015-10-08
Group:		sidr
Pages:		9
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05

Abstract:
  This document defines a Trust Anchor Locator (TAL) for the Resource
  Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI).  This document obsoletes RFC6490 by
  adding support for multiple URIs in a TAL.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat