Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised I-D Needed "
Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Thu, 08 October 2015 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A901B2D43 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fc7W_76sWyZy for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ia-mailgw.apnic.net (ia-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:a:851::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A861B2D41 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:return-path; bh=6yjRnI8tH+4C5cpNw7S5MC+6o5V+psl/PdtYESK5wOY=; b=mVVs7JQKEdst3Jtyiz5YjfToF5BrXWMLkXK0KBWh3VGiThDMzsjcBoXvm5shIqykp0AljJ2uKAAWJ EK8egxiOVCiDWL2G50KHULpo5zWr5YdbRHfml2MVBiL4x79zs5abSASe1AADvrpD2fzXy1FAC85nOO Om9ovDeHdgTGQ/3Y=
Received: from iamda3.org.apnic.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:2::101:249]) by ia-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:56:37 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from [172.16.137.34] (203.119.101.249) by iamda3.org.apnic.net (203.119.111.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:56:22 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <E91F4D62-1FB4-4AFE-B07D-34019EAB031F@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 17:56:13 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <7A8285B5-6C9E-4E8D-8486-CA719414AA68@apnic.net>
References: <E91F4D62-1FB4-4AFE-B07D-34019EAB031F@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/q3Zm6DLgQCfPnRzQ_7L8jyaKTG8>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised I-D Needed "
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 21:56:29 -0000
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 2:03 PM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote: > > The draft draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 was approved by the IESG, provided the comments received during IETF Last Call were addressed. > > The IETF Last Call comments were noted to the sidr list in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07208.html. > > As wg co-chair, I am satisfied that wg has consensus is to adopt “Option #2” [ (allow but do not mandate line breaks)] as mentioned in the message that brought up the problem [http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07164.html]. > > The draft authors are requested to submit a revised version of the draft including this response. That would get the draft to publication. > > In the initial message, the following text was suggested. The draft authors may use this as they wish. > > 2. Permit but don't require newlines. For example, change Section 2.1 > item #3 from: > > 3) a subjectPublicKeyInfo [RFC5280] in DER format [X.509], > encoded in Base64 (see Section 4 of [RFC4648]. > > to: > > 3) a subjectPublicKeyInfo [RFC5280] in DER format [X.509], > encoded in Base64 (see Section 4 of [RFC4648]). To avoid > long lines, <CRLF> or <LF> line breaks MAY be inserted into > the Base64 encoded string. > > —Sandy, speaking as co-chair Sorry for the delay - it slipped off the desk and the dog ate it. Here’s the revised id with that vitally critical sentence added. A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05.txt has been successfully submitted by Geoff Huston and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis Revision: 05 Title: Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator Document date: 2015-10-08 Group: sidr Pages: 9 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05 Abstract: This document defines a Trust Anchor Locator (TAL) for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI). This document obsoletes RFC6490 by adding support for multiple URIs in a TAL. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised… Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Rev… Geoff Huston