IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06.txt

"Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com> Tue, 26 June 2012 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A961A21F85F7 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TDREEaP6s61e for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085FE21F8606 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rogaglia@cisco.com; l=2153; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1340741043; x=1341950643; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fpBHiKKuemlJUiOBLFmCO24M0Tz3F8M2EViWPMxFLxE=; b=V8mu9zs+O7XVLVJnWIgAPHL1rh6+FLvXb/OGw592uJ27iU57U/vS/v6E Eow2oQskBzaRi6ntpI+sIvZcm/QoG6QtJs3sNEzpORIS5Z6qa8Qt9dGyW W1Bpg3wPwkU+KLx+NGss4s/zaZPBRWx9thR4W7+M3tfWil6W2jeoUN09W U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAKUU6k+tJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABEtjWBB4IYAQEBAwEBAQEPASc0GwIBCDYQJwslAgQTIodkBQuZFqBQizeFJGADlTKBEo0LgWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,478,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="96198012"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2012 20:04:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5QK42Uf012765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:04:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.99]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:04:02 -0500
From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNU9bUdl573GZljEKjNdQTyuN38Q==
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:04:01 +0000
Message-ID: <831DCFF1-B985-44A8-96CD-0960B0E9B2E2@cisco.com>
References: <20120626195906.19632.28558.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120626195906.19632.28558.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.83.152]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-18996.004
x-tm-as-result: No--43.224700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <431906B597AC5B4D91B3B2FB392AF493@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:04:03 -0000

Dear WG,

This update covers quite some comments received from the WG Chairs review after the WGLC. The main change is an organization one as we created a specific section on how to deprecate a suite (Section 10).

We do not have pending issue and we believe it should now move to next step in the publication process.

Regards,
Roque

On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:59 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
 <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.
> 	Author(s)       : Roque Gagliano
>                          Stephen Kent
>                          Sean Turner
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 29
> 	Date            : 2012-06-26
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document specifies the process that Certification Authorities
>   (CAs) and Relying Parties (RPs) participating in the Resource Public
>   Key Infrastructure (RPKI) will need to follow to transition to a new
>   (and probably cryptographically stronger) algorithm set.  The process
>   is expected to be completed in a time scale of months or years.
>   Consequently, no emergency transition is specified.  The transition
>   procedure defined in this document supports only a top-down migration
>   (parent migrates before children).
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06
> 
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-06
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email